4 ms·

From: https://processingfoundation.org/ https://processingfoundation.org/ "We invite you to meditate on digital fragmentation and infrastructure that lays its

From: https://processingfoundation.org/ https://processingfoundation.org/ "We invite you to meditate on digital fragmentation and infrastructure that lays its foundation through the global white capitalist, colonialist, and imperialist framework we live in today through our Land and Digital Acknowledgements." tl;dr: divisive nonsense

mvelbaum 3y ago
Sounds like commie gobbledygook to me.
- xmcqdpt2 3y ago
  This comment has strong 1960s vibes.
  - indy 3y ago
    It's a reference to Norm Macdonald
  - papandada 3y ago
    It's likely invoking Norm MacDonald (who used this phrase humorously when Sara Silverman was explaining what a "comedy collective" was)
fleshdaddy 3y ago
Yeah it’s really bizarre. It reminds me of times when I’ve gone to a charities website and things start getting weird and eventually I realize it’s run by some religious cult. Sucks though, seems like at a certain point you should just be honest that you are more interested in social issues so that people who want to support the actual development of processing know your foundation isn’t the way to do so.
- 15457345234 3y ago
  > at a certain point you should just be honest Yeah but then nobody will give you $10M in crypto
  - fleshdaddy 3y ago
    I don’t know tbh I’d assume those people donate because they made some money off of the work done on processing and want to give some back to keep development going. I’d think if you wanted to donate to the stuff they’re on about you’d find a non profit specifically for that purpose. I’m sure there are plenty and they’re probably better at it than a software foundation haha.
    - 15457345234 3y ago
      Yeah, on further examination it looks like a lot of NFT artists created work using processing and have kicked it back, which explains why the donations were so crypto-heavy. It was giving odd vibes for a bit but it seems cool.
- tonyg 3y ago
  It's right there on the homepage. What more do you want?
- boppo1 3y ago
  >should just be honest that you are more interested in social issues so that people who want to support the actual development of processing know your foundation isn’t the way to do so. That's a feature, not a bug.
sterlingcrispin 3y ago
Ironically, not paying the producers and maintainers of the code is classic capitalism.
wellthisisgreat 3y ago
I read the whole thing and Jesus Christ this is atrocious. Can’t imagine what it feels like to found a framework that became a driving force behind “creative coding” and watch it taken over by indoctrinated zealots who don’t care about the craft and the art of programming, and waste resources on social posturing.
millzlane 3y ago
It reads like it was written by a person who does not seek to divide.
- deleted 3y ago
  [deleted]

mvelbaum 3y ago

Sounds like commie gobbledygook to me.

xmcqdpt2 3y ago
This comment has strong 1960s vibes.
- indy 3y ago
  It's a reference to Norm Macdonald
- papandada 3y ago
  It's likely invoking Norm MacDonald (who used this phrase humorously when Sara Silverman was explaining what a "comedy collective" was)

fleshdaddy 3y ago

Yeah it’s really bizarre. It reminds me of times when I’ve gone to a charities website and things start getting weird and eventually I realize it’s run by some religious cult. Sucks though, seems like at a certain point you should just be honest that you are more interested in social issues so that people who want to support the actual development of processing know your foundation isn’t the way to do so.

15457345234 3y ago
> at a certain point you should just be honest Yeah but then nobody will give you $10M in crypto
- fleshdaddy 3y ago
  I don’t know tbh I’d assume those people donate because they made some money off of the work done on processing and want to give some back to keep development going. I’d think if you wanted to donate to the stuff they’re on about you’d find a non profit specifically for that purpose. I’m sure there are plenty and they’re probably better at it than a software foundation haha.
  - 15457345234 3y ago
    Yeah, on further examination it looks like a lot of NFT artists created work using processing and have kicked it back, which explains why the donations were so crypto-heavy. It was giving odd vibes for a bit but it seems cool.
tonyg 3y ago
It's right there on the homepage. What more do you want?
boppo1 3y ago
>should just be honest that you are more interested in social issues so that people who want to support the actual development of processing know your foundation isn’t the way to do so. That's a feature, not a bug.

sterlingcrispin 3y ago

Ironically, not paying the producers and maintainers of the code is classic capitalism.

wellthisisgreat 3y ago

I read the whole thing and Jesus Christ this is atrocious. Can’t imagine what it feels like to found a framework that became a driving force behind “creative coding” and watch it taken over by indoctrinated zealots who don’t care about the craft and the art of programming, and waste resources on social posturing.

millzlane 3y ago

It reads like it was written by a person who does not seek to divide.

deleted 3y ago
[deleted]