4 ms·
The BBC is also actively using more of their accounts on X with the last time they posted is less than an hour ago on https://twitter.com/BBCSport https://twitt
by rvz 3y ago
The BBC is also actively using more of their accounts on X with the last time they posted is less than an hour ago on https://twitter.com/BBCSport https://twitter.com/BBCSport, https://twitter.com/BBCWorld https://twitter.com/BBCWorld and https://twitter.com/BBCBreaking https://twitter.com/BBCBreaking.
On threads their last post on BBC Sports was 12 hours ago: https://www.threads.net/@bbcsport https://www.threads.net/@bbcsport
So in fact, they are more active on Twitter / X than on the rest of the social networks.
But surely that somehow means 'X is dying' /s
- iudqnolq 3y agoCan you see many replies by the BBC? Genuine question, I just get a Twitter frontend error when I open the replies tab. (In Musk's defense, I got this sort of error frequently pre-acquisition). If it's mostly top-level posts that could just be the same script pumping out content on all their platforms.
- AshamedCaptain 3y agoWhy is this being downvoted? TFA is literally lying. Since the article has been posted, they have posted more to Twitter than to either of Threads or Mastodon. This is like the fluffers who set a mastodon URL in their Twitter profile to threaten Twitter but have never even considered actually posting to Mastodon. Soon: BBC gives up on Mastodon, sticks with BlueSky. And my remark will still be as valid: they will have posted more on Twitter than on Threads, Mastodon, or BlueSky. It's just ridiculous games at this point. If you wanted any more proof of the network effect and how much you can ruin an Internet service* and still keep all of its users captive, look no further. (*Twitter literally shows the replies out of order for me right now. It is a technical disaster and yet my government still uses it almost exclusively.)