> would spending less time >1G but <2G be equivalent to spending larger amounts of time at 1G? The experiments need to be done, but my wild uninformed guess is

> would spending less time >1G but <2G be equivalent to spending larger amounts of time at 1G? The experiments need to be done, but my wild uninformed guess is: Human health is not math, the numbers won't stack up like "1.5G times 2 hours = 3 G-hours" Humans have evolved under 1.0G, all the way back the the ancestor who crawled up out of the sea around 400 million years ago. That's a long time with that as an environmental constant. Deviation from that environment in either direction, up or down, will have negative effects on the body. Some easy to predict, some less so.