> So long as the only houses they DO toss are ones where a judge has reviewed the evidence, and determined that there is probable cause that tossing the house

> So long as the only houses they DO toss are ones where a judge has reviewed the evidence, and determined that there is probable cause that tossing the house will turn up fruits You have a lot more faith than I do. I'd bet it's a lot more like a rubber stamp with basically zero review, assuming they bother with warrants at all (https://petapixel.com/2022/07/27/googles-nest-will-provide-data-to-police-without-a-warrant/ https://petapixel.com/2022/07/27/googles-nest-will-provide-d... https://www.aclu.org/news/privacy-technology/new-records-detail-dhs-purchase-and-use-of-vast-quantities-of-cell-phone-location-data https://www.aclu.org/news/privacy-technology/new-records-det... https://www.latimes.com/business/technology/story/2021-03-24/federal-agencies-subpoena-google-personal-information https://www.latimes.com/business/technology/story/2021-03-24... https://experiencedcriminallawyers.com/what-private-information-will-google-give-cops-without-a-warrant https://experiencedcriminallawyers.com/what-private-informat...)