3 ms·
No, you're not correct. We have over $2M ARR and with the amount of data we are storing it would be downright stupid to use Supabase. We don't also "pipe" our
by weird-eye-issue 3y ago
No, you're not correct. We have over $2M ARR and with the amount of data we are storing it would be downright stupid to use Supabase.
We don't also "pipe" our data to Supabase, we use a couple different data stores depending on the best use case. For example we also use R2 and Durable Objects.
Just because you have a hammer doesn't mean everything is a nail.
- BoorishBears 3y agoWell maybe we have different definitions of scale: I think my team spends about $2M a month on compute, so we don't pride ourselves on randomly pulling in new vendors.
- weird-eye-issue 3y agoYou are incredibly dense
- BoorishBears 3y agoWhen you're playing checkers people playing by the rules of chess might seem dense.
- weird-eye-issue 3y agoIt's pretty incredible how you know more about our needs, usage, and infrastructure than we do :D Also don't you think it's funny calling out somebody else's tech choices when you have zero insight into it and when it's worked out perfectly for us? By the way, how many TBs of vector data are you storing in Postgres and needing to retrieve with minimal latency?
- BoorishBears 3y agoI work on autonomous vehicles: we generate more data every day than you likely generate in 10 lifetimes of your CRUD app escapades.
- weird-eye-issue 3y agoBragging about generating lots of data? Wow, cool buddy Literally irrelevant lol