4 ms·
C99 to C23 is not obvious to … Not in our lifetime I know, but we sort of understand why we have year 2000 problem. It seems as human, we know what that missi
by ngcc_hk 3y ago
C99 to C23 is not obvious to …
Not in our lifetime I know, but we sort of understand why we have year 2000 problem. It seems as human, we know what that missing years are or “reverse numbering” is ok.
- cozzyd 3y agoAs long as the C committee avoids publishing standards in 2089, 2099, 2111, 2114, 2117 and 2123, the numbering scheme can go on for at least another 100 years...