Bankman-Fried lying about it does. Which I understand as, it's gota be determined the extent of the lying to determine the extent of the fraud ; some you-didnt

Bankman-Fried lying about it does. Which I understand as, it's gota be determined the extent of the lying to determine the extent of the fraud ; some you-didnt-read-the-contract-well-enough responsability may incumb on the customer(s). holding assets on their customers' behalf Who said he was, him? Of course Im playing devil's advocate here to illustrate the logic of the law as presented by our friend here.