> it turns out no one used them Can you explain what this means? E.g. Debian very much sticks to LTS kernel versions in their stable releases. Were they not wo

> it turns out no one used them Can you explain what this means? E.g. Debian very much sticks to LTS kernel versions in their stable releases. Were they not working with upstream, you? If they'd be doing their own maintenance, there's no need for them to stick to LTS versions, but clearly they didn't tell you. Any idea what's going on there?