And amusingly, I read it as "assume 3 parties, Amazon, Target, Y. Target has a sale, so Amazon price matches sale. Y was price matching Amazon. Target ends s

And amusingly, I read it as "assume 3 parties, Amazon, Target, Y. Target has a sale, so Amazon price matches sale. Y was price matching Amazon. Target ends sale, but Amazon and Y have stuck each other on the lower price." That is, it makes it sound like Nessie was intended to bust some broken price matching logic that would allow other competitors to stick Amazon at lower prices due to interactions with other parties.