Here's the problem: we could potentially deescalate this debate by using more tactful language. But do we really want to? Is the answer to this situation a neu

Here's the problem: we could potentially deescalate this debate by using more tactful language. But do we really want to? Is the answer to this situation a neutral position? I don't think so. Intellectual monopoly is bullshit. I see no value in deescalating the narrative. What we need is change. Change can't be made by taking a step back and deescalating the narrative.