5 ms·

Interesting to see their test indicating battery life is worse than the Intel 13th gen variant. Notebookcheck's result[1] was vastly different: > Runtimes are

by dogas 3y ago

Interesting to see their test indicating battery life is worse than the Intel 13th gen variant. Notebookcheck's result[1] was vastly different: > Runtimes are longer than the Intel-based configurations by significant margins due to the lower power consumption levels mentioned above. We're able to browse the web for over 3 hours longer on our AMD model versus the Core i7-1370P model when both are set to Balanced mode and 150 nit brightness. [1]: https://www.notebookcheck.net/Framework-Laptop-13-5-Ryzen-7-7840U-review-So-much-better-than-the-Intel-version.756613.0.html https://www.notebookcheck.net/Framework-Laptop-13-5-Ryzen-7-...

sva_ 3y ago
I wonder what magic gets them more than 12 hours out of a 61Wh battery when the average idle power usage is already 6.5w.
- PrefersAwkward 3y ago
  [dead]
deleted 3y ago
[deleted]
soulnothing 3y ago
There was a note on Reddit that the ports / expansion cards were in the wrong way to maximize power efficiency. USB c in back two, USB a in the front. Link to official comment https://www.reddit.com/r/framework/comments/16ytxjd/comment/k3ar79v/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3 https://www.reddit.com/r/framework/comments/16ytxjd/comment/... Direct to knowledge base https://knowledgebase.frame.work/en_us/expansion-card-functionality-on-framework-laptop-13-amd-ryzen-7040-series-SkrVx7gAh https://knowledgebase.frame.work/en_us/expansion-card-functi...
- invalidator 3y ago
  That's an interesting quirk! I thought they were all just USB-C ports internally. Do you know why this matters?
  - soulnothing 3y ago
    Updated parent comment with links. The back 2 are USB 4 while the front are usb 3.2 is one thing. Last I read, the USB a cards don't fully enter suspend in the os. I have an 11th gen and I pop out my USB a to save battery when I don't need it. The hdmi also used to have that problem but that's since been fixed.
  - mananaysiempre 3y ago
    They are all USB-C as far as the physical interface goes, but their protocol capabilities are different: the rear ones are USB4 (actually full TB4 AFAIU, except Intel refuses to certify AMD systems), the front ones are USB3.2+DP and USB3.2. The fundamental reason seems to be that a “mobile CPU” is more of a SoC, including built-in USB capability, and (unlike the Intels) the AMD ones only do two USB4 ports, which on the Framework are routed to the rear. This, then, is done through USB4-capable retimers, which turned out to draw noticeable power when a USB-A card with a pulldown is connected and idling; but no better retimers could be substituted. The front USB3.2 ports use different retimers and don’t suffer from this. (Why do the Intel motherboards not have this problem? No idea, but if I had to guess, Intel probably makes the retimers for those and is refusing to let them be used with AMD processors.)
    - jychang 3y ago
      That’s pretty cool information. Also this is the type of stuff where Apple would make sure the end user would not have to worry about it. Charitably, they’d put in the money/effort to make sure all 4 USB ports are the same (notably, all USB ports on a macbook pro can charge at 100W, which is not a trivial task); or uncharitably, they’d just say fuck it and ship a laptop with only 2 USB ports.
      - mananaysiempre 3y ago

by dogas 3y ago

sva_ 3y ago

I wonder what magic gets them more than 12 hours out of a 61Wh battery when the average idle power usage is already 6.5w.

PrefersAwkward 3y ago
[dead]

deleted 3y ago

[deleted]

soulnothing 3y ago

There was a note on Reddit that the ports / expansion cards were in the wrong way to maximize power efficiency. USB c in back two, USB a in the front. Link to official comment https://www.reddit.com/r/framework/comments/16ytxjd/comment/k3ar79v/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3 https://www.reddit.com/r/framework/comments/16ytxjd/comment/... Direct to knowledge base https://knowledgebase.frame.work/en_us/expansion-card-functionality-on-framework-laptop-13-amd-ryzen-7040-series-SkrVx7gAh https://knowledgebase.frame.work/en_us/expansion-card-functi...

invalidator 3y ago
That's an interesting quirk! I thought they were all just USB-C ports internally. Do you know why this matters?
- soulnothing 3y ago
  Updated parent comment with links. The back 2 are USB 4 while the front are usb 3.2 is one thing. Last I read, the USB a cards don't fully enter suspend in the os. I have an 11th gen and I pop out my USB a to save battery when I don't need it. The hdmi also used to have that problem but that's since been fixed.
- mananaysiempre 3y ago
  They are all USB-C as far as the physical interface goes, but their protocol capabilities are different: the rear ones are USB4 (actually full TB4 AFAIU, except Intel refuses to certify AMD systems), the front ones are USB3.2+DP and USB3.2. The fundamental reason seems to be that a “mobile CPU” is more of a SoC, including built-in USB capability, and (unlike the Intels) the AMD ones only do two USB4 ports, which on the Framework are routed to the rear. This, then, is done through USB4-capable retimers, which turned out to draw noticeable power when a USB-A card with a pulldown is connected and idling; but no better retimers could be substituted. The front USB3.2 ports use different retimers and don’t suffer from this. (Why do the Intel motherboards not have this problem? No idea, but if I had to guess, Intel probably makes the retimers for those and is refusing to let them be used with AMD processors.)
  - jychang 3y ago
    That’s pretty cool information. Also this is the type of stuff where Apple would make sure the end user would not have to worry about it. Charitably, they’d put in the money/effort to make sure all 4 USB ports are the same (notably, all USB ports on a macbook pro can charge at 100W, which is not a trivial task); or uncharitably, they’d just say fuck it and ship a laptop with only 2 USB ports.
    - mananaysiempre 3y ago