I figure it’s just an interesting perspective on the perceived need of AI alignment. If a user posts tasks to mechanical Turk with a view to doing something of

I figure it’s just an interesting perspective on the perceived need of AI alignment. If a user posts tasks to mechanical Turk with a view to doing something of dubious ethics, is it up to the mechanical Turks to refuse the task? Is it up to Amazon to enforce their terms of service on the user? Or does liability for any ethical breaches begin and end at the person who set the task in the first place? How does that inform us about the liability Microsoft should have for offering access to a version of ChatGPT that willingly solves CAPTCHAs? And given that, why do we think Microsoft tried to teach it not to solve them in the first place?