3 ms·
I disagree. Drunk driving is treated like a joke, some harmless "Oops", but it's not. Also it's a personality fair: someone who is ok with driving drunk is a c
by rangerelf 3y ago
I disagree. Drunk driving is treated like a joke, some harmless "Oops", but it's not.
Also it's a personality fair: someone who is ok with driving drunk is a candidate for worse things. I for one think it's a good thing to keep their biometrics on hand for _WHEN_ that happens.
And if people are found to be abusing this information, prosecute them for it.
- imchillyb 3y agoI didn’t mention any specific charge, or crime, purposely. The indefinite biometric capture is the topic. Indefinitely retained biometric capture is inherently bad; period. There is no scenario where governments can be trusted with that data, especially if it never expires is never deleted and can become ammunition for opposing views.