Not sure why you'd bring up such a blatantly obvious point. All I'm saying it would be hilarious to see a terminally paranoid person argue why they don't want

Not sure why you'd bring up such a blatantly obvious point. All I'm saying it would be hilarious to see a terminally paranoid person argue why they don't want the government to keep fingerprint records of criminals in front of a family of people whose lives were just permanently altered for the better by the same records. I can't even think of very strong arguments against such records, which makes the above even more hilarious. But I get the opposition, it's scary when the government has permanent records of people.