Science isn’t perfect, but they have repeatable theoretical models. That’s literally what separates them from the social studies. > It is precisely why I regar

Science isn’t perfect, but they have repeatable theoretical models. That’s literally what separates them from the social studies. > It is precisely why I regard computational social science as important, seeking to bridge the seeming incompatibilities between exact and inexact phenomena. Yes, this is what I meant with a near perfect simulation. We agree here > Even after more than a century of social science, we are only at the cusp of understanding the foundational patterns that make up social life This is what’s meant for social studies lacking repeatable theoretical models