3 ms·
I don't know what the author has against inches. Other than being US focused it seems like as reasonable unit as any. I think it makes more sense to use an abso
by kevincox 3y ago
I don't know what the author has against inches. Other than being US focused it seems like as reasonable unit as any. I think it makes more sense to use an absolute every-day unit than pixels. Plus for pixels the question is who's pixels? Should the size of things change if someone opens it with a high DPI display?
Also I suspect embedding maps or looking stuff up when making a presentation is pretty common. I don't like the sidebar approach to it (sidebar should be a browser feature if anything) but I think it does make product sense.
The other points seem spot-on though. Although a few are a little nitpicky about getting perfect styling and alignment that the average user isn't too concerned about.
> List indentations look moronic when you resize text
Oh, this one bites me in Google Docs. I always wondering why the intents look awful by default.
- delfinom 3y ago>Other than being US focused it seems like as reasonable unit as any. ...Majority of the world uses metric. People actually do print slides and may want to design it for both printing (where the paper is metric) and display.
- kevincox 3y ago> Other than being US focused
- spookie 3y agoWell, that's the crux of the problem though. The majority of the world can't just dismiss it like that.
- kevincox 3y agoBut this doesn't fall under "Hilarious". Sure, ideally the default unit should match locale. But not doing that doesn't seem like they are trolling to me. They are just lazy. The decision isn't dumb, they just targeted their primary audience (even if it is a minority) and moved on. And the authors suggestion of pixel seems worse, even to me living in a metric-first country. I would take inches over px as a default (but give me mm please).
- jurimasa 3y agoBut it is hilarious. The constant, unrelenting navel-gazing is very, very funny.
- itishappy 3y agoHow many inches are in a slide? How many pixels? They're probably picking a standard slide size and using inches relative to that, which I guess makes sense, but I think I'd prefer unitless at that point.
- kevincox 3y agoYeah, but if you are saying "a slide is 1080px tall" then you may as well use a real unit, since pixels are basically a synthetic unit at this point. A real unit does help you when printing with no real downside.
- itishappy 3y agoOnly if it's standardized somehow! 1, 2, or 4 slides per page? What margins? Letter or A4? If we're doing inch to inch conversions, we may as well just go unitless!
- itishappy 3y agoDid some research. Apparently Microsoft and Apple both uses inches in their presentation software. However, I've found 3 or 4 different answers for what a "standard slide size" is. So apparently there's precedence for Google's choices, even if I'm lost as to the reasoning. Edit: Hmm, I actually bet it has something to do with font sizing.
- karmakaze 3y agoFor printed documents I prefer inches since letter paper is 8.5" x 11" and there are common chars/inch, lines/inch, and of course 72 points/inch. With Google Slides though I only use on screens and always just go by the ticks whatever they may be.
- jmye 3y agoYou’ve got me curious - who has ever embedded a map in a presentation and why? It seems absolutely useless to me, but I’d love to learn why it isn’t!