4 ms·
Monitoring is the result of poor privacy laws, not zoning regulations. In the US, we have no movement restrictions in our pre-1910, well-designed towns, so the
by jaybrendansmith 3y ago
Monitoring is the result of poor privacy laws, not zoning regulations. In the US, we have no movement restrictions in our pre-1910, well-designed towns, so the two are not correlated here. Ghettos are not inevitable. I think a lack of transit or highway access is definitely a major concern, which is why modern planners need to ensure that dense, multi-use, 15-minute cities have both. The same mistakes were made in the US with our streetcar suburbs ... we removed the transit and ended up with many claustrophobic areas with poor access. None of this is inevitable, but it happens when planning is disregarded, and cities have illogical zoning and planning regulations, or when regulatory capture is allowed to run rampant.
- motohagiography 3y agoBe dense and multi use, but absolutely ban surveillance by making its products inadmissible in any proceeding, and make collecting personal data without a license punishable. If you don’t do that, you get domestic passports and gesundheitpass schemes for restricting basic freedom of movement and association. You can’t advocate 15min cities and be ignorant of privacy or treat it as an externality without colluding with some very evil interests who are co-opting and fooling naive environmentalists. It’s banality of evil level stuff.