3 ms·
Call it "The Public IPFS DHT v1.0" then ;)
by cjrp 3y ago
Call it "The Public IPFS DHT v1.0" then ;)
- ethbr1 3y agoBecause that wouldn't be confusing if a novel implementation named itself "The Public IPFS DHT v2.0"? Specificity >> descriptiveness, when you're aiming for a distributed future with multiple parties As much as I hate AWS' jungle of names, I get why they did it. And it's probably better than any alternative