4 ms·
But that in turn is less efficient than 0 desks for 15 people. Thinking about it, why stop there? Negative desking is the future. A team of 15 could have -15 d
by seanhunter 3y ago
But that in turn is less efficient than 0 desks for 15 people.
Thinking about it, why stop there? Negative desking is the future. A team of 15 could have -15 desks (or less, if they are high performers). Super efficient.
- m_rpn 3y agoI hope that no CEO reads your comment otherwise all the guys that have mandatory RTO are screwed XD
- muzani 3y agoThe most common implementation for negative desking is having everyone working from home
- seanhunter 3y agoThat's just zerodesking. For negative desking the team has to turn their hotdesking area into a wework.
- cwilkes 3y agoI’m envisioning carnival barkers trying to get other teams to use up their -15 seats as if they don’t sell out they have to pay the company a rental fee.