4 ms·
Unless it were one of my only options, I would rather not. I know it’s slim i would personally be targeted but after hearing how Elon disrupted service for Ukra
by hk1337 3y ago
Unless it were one of my only options, I would rather not. I know it’s slim i would personally be targeted but after hearing how Elon disrupted service for Ukraine during an operation, I would rather not put my towards someone like that.
- signatoremo 3y agoHe didn’t disrupt the service, according to the head of Ukraine’s Defense Intelligence: ———- KB: This specific case everybody's referring to, there was a shutdown of the coverage over Crimea, but it wasn't at that specific moment. That shutdown was for a month. There might have been some specific cases I'm not aware of. But I'm totally sure that throughout the whole first period of the war, there was no coverage at all. TWZ: But did he ever put it on and then shut it off? KB: There have been no problems since it's been turned on over Crimea. ———- https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/exclusive-interview-with-ukraines-spy-boss-from-his-dc-hotel-room https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/exclusive-interview-wi...
- wenebego 3y ago"There was a shutdown of the coverage over Crimea" is the disruption of service. It also sounds like there is a translation barrier, or they are being really careful not to upset elon, lest he shutdown their internet for another month
- inemesitaffia 3y agoYou can't turn off something that was never on