This is also related to human composition. Whether written out or not, few writers just start typing a story and see where it goes. There was actually a great

This is also related to human composition. Whether written out or not, few writers just start typing a story and see where it goes. There was actually a great neuroscience paper last year looking at how human predictive processing seemed best categorized as a three layer approach - broad, medium, narrow temporality. And discussing the idea that this might apply to LLMs . So if you have a paragraph summary of a story you want to be 10 pages, having the first step be generating a one page treatment of the story from the paragraph and then feeding that in to writing the full story will lead to a better pacing. Want more interesting character arcs? Have it generate short character motivations, vulnerabilities, etc for key characters that gets fed in before the one page step. "Fancy autocomplete" is a powerful tool, but it isn't a replacement for story workshoping. But the latter can be embedded as a process into the former fairly successfully, particularly with few shot intermediate steps.