4 ms·
Sure, and that licensed work was created by people. Those people should get paid upon the creation of new derivative work. That’s exactly what copyright law is.
by cush 3y ago
Sure, and that licensed work was created by people. Those people should get paid upon the creation of new derivative work. That’s exactly what copyright law is.
- djur 3y agoCopyright law does not currently mandate any particular payment schedule for licensing work. Are you suggesting that it should?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- cush 3y agoOkay… I feel you understand what I’m getting at but are super keen on nitpicking. I know copyright doesn’t mandate payment schedules. It’s a legal tool that prevents people from distributing derivative work without permission. Currently (most) AI models don’t attribute original creators (let alone pay them royalties), which means it’s impossible to pay content creators even if we wanted to. It’s a widely known issue that’s a really hot topic right now. https://hbr.org/2023/04/generative-ai-has-an-intellectual-property-problem https://hbr.org/2023/04/generative-ai-has-an-intellectual-pr...
- djur 3y agoI'm not nitpicking, I'm trying to understand what you mean by "copyright law [taking] a massive leap forward in the next year".