3 ms·
You're really doing Professor Hawks a disservice by imagining him as some kind of foul right-wing agitator. He's actually bending over backward to be fair. He
by moldbug 15y ago
You're really doing Professor Hawks a disservice by imagining him as some kind of foul right-wing agitator. He's actually bending over backward to be fair.
Here's how a slightly more partisan biologist (Peter Frost) responds to the same material:
http://evoandproud.blogspot.com/2011/07/arroseur-arrose.html http://evoandproud.blogspot.com/2011/07/arroseur-arrose.html
Here's the NY Times:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/14/science/14skull.html http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/14/science/14skull.html
- ktizo 15y agoOther than stating that the blog post was highly editorialised, there was absolutely no indication given by whyenot about what Hawks biases might be. To be honest, your comment reads strongly as though you are projecting.