> They’re comparing LLM output to professional creative writers? I mean that seems a fair experiment to judge based on the rhetoric employed by AI enthusiasts,

> They’re comparing LLM output to professional creative writers? I mean that seems a fair experiment to judge based on the rhetoric employed by AI enthusiasts, who talk of things like "democratizing art" (as though art as it exists is somehow anti-democratic?) and letting any layman slam some text into a prompt and get a work of shakespeare, a painting by Da Vinci, or a Mozart symphony back. I think it's nonsense but they don't, so test it?