3 ms·

D-D requires a higher triple product than D-T fusion and produces less energy, so most companies go with D-T, and don't attempt to use D-D to produce the tritiu

D-D requires a higher triple product than D-T fusion and produces less energy, so most companies go with D-T, and don't attempt to use D-D to produce the tritium. But D-D takes a lower triple product than D-He3, so if you can get net power from D-He3, then D-D is a fine way to produce the He3. Helion is the only company that thinks they can get net power from D-He3 so they're also the only company pursuing D-D for breeding.

RC_ITR 3y ago
>D-D requires a higher triple product than D-T fusion and produces less energy, so most companies go with D-T, and don't attempt to use D-D to produce the tritium. Yes, because again, all the ways we know how to make Tritium are implausible from either an energy balance standpoint or a "where do we get all these energized neutrons" standpoint. That's always been my argument. >You don't need to breed He3 unless you can get net power from D-He3. If you can do that, then you can probably also get net power from D-D Going back to this, you're aware D-D results in 50% T and 50% He3, right? Helion relies on D-T fusion working so they can sell their "waste" Tritium (lol). None of these things you are claiming to be easy factually pencil out and that is why we are so far from commercial fusion.
- DennisP 3y ago
  D-T: Where you get all those energized neutrons is easy: from D-T fusion. You need a neutron multiplier like lead or beryllium, then it looks like you can average about 1.15 tritium atoms per D-T reaction. Helion: to use their tritium they just have to wait. Tritium decays to He3 with a 12-year half-life. (Of course if they didn't want to use the tritium at all, it would just mean building twice as many D-D reactors and it'd still work. That'd be silly though.)