> Another unfortunate example of locale dependence is the Unicode handling of dotless i in the Turkish language. This isn't quite Unicode's fault, as the alter

> Another unfortunate example of locale dependence is the Unicode handling of dotless i in the Turkish language. This isn't quite Unicode's fault, as the alternative would be to have two codepoints each for `i` and `I`, one pair for the Latin versions and one for the Turkish versions, and that would be very annoying too. Whereas the Russian/Bulgarian situation is different. There used to be language tags in Unicode for that, but IIRC they got deprecated, and maybe they'll have to get undeprecated.