4 ms·
No, like 20 years and only in the very small percentage of people where you have people from the same part of India working with each other, they decide to carr
by huytersd 3y ago
No, like 20 years and only in the very small percentage of people where you have people from the same part of India working with each other, they decide to carry over caste politics from India and take the step to bring it into their professional lives. This is a very small number of people.
Codifying it just makes it so people are required to remember their labels for the benefits that come from identifying as a victimized community and pass those labels on to their kids. It’s fucking terrible.
- viraptor 3y ago> it just makes it so people are required to remember their labels Why do you think you need to know your label? If someone thinks you're of a given caste and discriminates against you, that's still wrong, regardless if they got the label right. For example, someone shouted some things at me (wrongly) assuming I was Jewish. That's shitty regardless and would be illegal in some circumstances.
- huytersd 3y agoI’ve answered this already. If there are benefits associated with a particular label (affirmative quota, social welfare benefits) then it incentivizes an individual to know their label.
- viraptor 3y ago> affirmative quota, social welfare benefits None of those are included in the bill: https://legiscan.com/CA/text/SB403/id/2840105 https://legiscan.com/CA/text/SB403/id/2840105 But they were not prevented from happening without the bill either.
- huytersd 3y agoYeah but generally in cases like this the initial bill is a stepping stone to follow up bills.