> How you have determined he was a "foreign agent or useful idiot" is curious. That's easy. Generally speaking, anyone who is critical of empire-building is se

> How you have determined he was a "foreign agent or useful idiot" is curious. That's easy. Generally speaking, anyone who is critical of empire-building is seen by that empire's apparatchiks as a "foreign agent or useful idiot." The criticism doesn't come from any position of principle, it's just us-versus-them tribalism.