3 ms·
> I doubt many English speakers care to distinguish between English dialects I think you'd be surprised how many english (UK) people will get pissed off when t
by notatoad 3y ago
> I doubt many English speakers care to distinguish between English dialects
I think you'd be surprised how many english (UK) people will get pissed off when their spell-checker starts removing the "u" from colour or flavour, or how many English (US) people get pissed off when the spellchecker starts suggesting random "u"s to words.
additionally to that, locale isn't just about language. English (US) and English (UK) decides whether your dates get formatted DD-MM-YY or MM-DD-YY, whether your numbers have the thousands broken by commas or spaces, and a host of other localization considerations with a lot more significance than just the dialect of english.
- aksss 3y agoI worked for BP for a while (well, as a contracted coder) and I got quite used to the UK spell check correcting everything to its idiom. Everything seemed wrong once I returned a world that dismissed the value of the letter 'U' and preferred the letter 'Z' over 'S'. Also missed the normalizing of drinking beer at lunch.
- denton-scratch 3y ago> Also missed the normalizing of drinking beer at lunch. Perhaps you're an old-timer? I worked in the city in the early 80s; lunch in the pub was routine, and sometimes required. By the end of the 80s, that was at best frowned on. Over the last 20 years, having alcohol on your breath after lunch would have been a disciplinary issue, unless you were entertaining a client, at least in the places I worked.
- aksss 3y agoIt's likely because I was in the exploration frontier of Alaska. This was late nineties, probably an operation run by people who worked in the city in the '80's and who could continue the old ways far away from the social glare of the head office. :D
- TRiG_Ireland 3y agoI'd really like an en-GB-oxendict (British English but favouring -ize over -ise) locale for formal writing.