4 ms·
It is so extraordinarily valuable that folks like Megan Gray have been attending these trials. This story would be so much more compelling if we could also see
by mbauman 3y ago
It is so extraordinarily valuable that folks like Megan Gray have been attending these trials. This story would be so much more compelling if we could also see that slide — but as a closed trial only those with the time and ability to actually go to the courthouse can see it.
On the same day this slide was presented, she also tweeted: https://nitter.net/megangrA/status/1704244948378194289 https://nitter.net/megangrA/status/1704244948378194289
> I am so livid at what just happened re public access in the Google Search antitrust case right now that I don’t trust myself to tweet about it yet. Back later.
- Crash0v3rid3 3y agoMegan made so many assumptions in that article based on a slide and single quote that we can't even see. How about they actually provide some evidence before making such claims?
- the-rc 3y agoConcrete question: how does the query rewriting service talk to the ads DB to do what's alleged?
- mbauman 3y agoWe don’t know how many assumptions Megan made or even who was testifying and what they assumed or what evidence was presented in court. Yes, that’s problematic.
- w1nst0nsm1th 3y agoIt happens it is actually an evidence or key exhibit, in an anti-trust trial. She could be surely sued by Google by reporting false events. So I guess we can trust her reporting.
- Crash0v3rid3 3y agoWhat? Why should I trust her reporting? She gave us zero evidence.
- w1nst0nsm1th 3y agoThen I guess Google could sue her. And they would win.
- rodonn 3y agoLooks like she was wrong: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37802116 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37802116