1. What are the 2 Chinas? 2. Re being more careful with negative statements -- they are clearly unable to do so consistently, see below: [1] Look at the very

1. What are the 2 Chinas? 2. Re being more careful with negative statements -- they are clearly unable to do so consistently, see below: [1] Look at the very clear headlines featuring "Iranian Government-Sponsored APT Actors" in https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/cybersecurity-advisories/aa22-320a https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/cybersecurity-advisories/aa... and "Iranian State Actor" in https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/cybersecurity-advisories/aa22-264a https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/cybersecurity-advisories/aa... [2] Again, look at the very clear headlines featuring "Russian State-Sponsored" in https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/cybersecurity-advisories/aa22-110a https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/cybersecurity-advisories/aa... Why are they not equally 'careful' here? Why are they not using the country's "official" names such as IRI (Islamic Republic of Iran) or RF (Russian Federation)? Note that I'm not even going into the rabbit hole of "PRC-Linked" vs "Iranian Government-Sponsored" -- although that is perfectly worth questioning also, because if you go into the actual article on Iran, they weasel out by saying "likely Iranian government-sponsored APT", whereas here it's only "PRC-linked" because we do not know for sure.