You're right, and I like the joke, but we should be clar that LLM != GPT != ChatGPT. There's a whole field emerging of prompt engineers, but I think what's des

You're right, and I like the joke, but we should be clar that LLM != GPT != ChatGPT. There's a whole field emerging of prompt engineers, but I think what's desperately missing is good quality integrated UX engineering. Being able to write a comment and/or a method signature and having an LLM spit out a generated piece of code is kinda cool, but the interface for showing that the code is buggy needs refining. I think that's likely to be quickly showing a test case: given these inputs I'm expecting this output. LLM refactors against all tests, and you iterate together towards the correct solution. That's one small example of how we can start to think about the future UX that isn't about having a "chat" about your code. Similar UX thought is needed in other disciplines, it'll be interesting to see how this domain evolves.