> This was also the Monarchist argument for not even allowing representative democracy (rule by "rabble"). And their premise was stupid because rule by inherit

> This was also the Monarchist argument for not even allowing representative democracy (rule by "rabble"). And their premise was stupid because rule by inheritance has zero guarantees. A representative democracy can more easily have a meritocratic aspect to it. > your American representative democracy I'm not american, and they literally have one of the worst possible "democratic" systems, so shouldn't be used for anything else other than an example on what not to do.