4 ms·
A hash is not reversible, so you’d need a database index to recover the original efficient-to-index identifier, which misses the whole point ;) If you didn’t c
by oconnore 3y ago
A hash is not reversible, so you’d need a database index to recover the original efficient-to-index identifier, which misses the whole point ;)
If you didn’t care about index clustering then just use UUIDv4
- masklinn 3y agoAlthough you could use a hash index to avoid the more deleterious effects of insertion, as long as you don’t need a unique constraint anyway…