5 ms·

If you are on Linux and prefer a Qt based GUI, then check out zuluCrypt[1]. It can create PLAIN dm-crypt, LUKS, TrueCrypt and VeraCrypt volumes. It can unlock

If you are on Linux and prefer a Qt based GUI, then check out zuluCrypt[1]. It can create PLAIN dm-crypt, LUKS, TrueCrypt and VeraCrypt volumes. It can unlock PLAIN dm-crypt, LUKS, TrueCrypt, VeraCrypt and Bitlocker volumes. [1] https://github.com/mhogomchungu/zuluCrypt https://github.com/mhogomchungu/zuluCrypt

Grimburger 3y ago
Not trying to diminish zulucrypt here but I really hope people aren't choosing encryption programs based on the GUI framework they use.
- tetris11 3y ago
  Well, veracrypt has a random seeding stage where you're required to shake the mouse around to create randomness. Problem is, that it only registers when the mouse is over the actual tiny veracrypt window. Problem with that is, it tells you that in some tiny bold text at the bottom. You can waste literally an hour wondering why the randomness meter goes up only sometimes. A better UI might fix that.
  - vlovich123 3y ago
    Afaik that kind of entropy generation is silly on modern machines. You should just call getrandom (or whatever the equivalent is for the modern OS it’s running on is) and be done with it. Hand rolled entropy like this isn’t necessary anymore - the OSes have very high quality CSPRNGs baked in natively and seeded directly from interrupts and other HW entropy sources.
    - tetris11 3y ago
      Good point. Is entropy built into the kernel, though? Last time I checked this I had to manually enable it as a system service, though this was a fair few years back.
    - Grimburger 3y ago
      > isn’t necessary anymore It also doesn't hurt if you hash it into or xor with existing randomness, it will still be as strong as the best source of entropy you have even if it's all 0's being mixed in.
  - vore 3y ago
    A small UI improvement is not worth switching from a far more tested and audited application. The UI might be worse, but I wouldn't play dice with applications with critical security requirements.
  - sandworm101 3y ago
    You can make the window bigger, at least that can be done on linux. Ive never tried veracrypt's gui on windows. I very likely never will.
    - mxmlnkn 3y ago
      You can even click on the window, hold the mouse button clicked and now all mouse movements, even outside the window, register and increase the randomness meter.
- speedgoose 3y ago
  I think putting some efforts in the user experience is important. A better GUI may mean that more people will use encryption. Bitlocker and FireVault are very easy to use compared to VeraCrypt or LUKS, and they are much more common. So many Linux installations don't have disk encryption…
  - Grimburger 3y ago
    Most definitely, especially in FOSS which has a dearth of good UX. But the point was more that this shouldn't be a form-over-function moment, do that with something else like a lounge purchase.
krylon 3y ago
That is nice. The big plus for VeraCrypt (and TrueCrypt before that), however, is that it works on Windows, macOS, and Linux. If you need an encrypted flash drive for sharing data between different systems, it's the only option that I know of. Which is unfortunate.

Grimburger 3y ago

Not trying to diminish zulucrypt here but I really hope people aren't choosing encryption programs based on the GUI framework they use.

tetris11 3y ago
Well, veracrypt has a random seeding stage where you're required to shake the mouse around to create randomness. Problem is, that it only registers when the mouse is over the actual tiny veracrypt window. Problem with that is, it tells you that in some tiny bold text at the bottom. You can waste literally an hour wondering why the randomness meter goes up only sometimes. A better UI might fix that.
- vlovich123 3y ago
  Afaik that kind of entropy generation is silly on modern machines. You should just call getrandom (or whatever the equivalent is for the modern OS it’s running on is) and be done with it. Hand rolled entropy like this isn’t necessary anymore - the OSes have very high quality CSPRNGs baked in natively and seeded directly from interrupts and other HW entropy sources.
  - tetris11 3y ago
    Good point. Is entropy built into the kernel, though? Last time I checked this I had to manually enable it as a system service, though this was a fair few years back.
  - Grimburger 3y ago
    > isn’t necessary anymore It also doesn't hurt if you hash it into or xor with existing randomness, it will still be as strong as the best source of entropy you have even if it's all 0's being mixed in.
- vore 3y ago
  A small UI improvement is not worth switching from a far more tested and audited application. The UI might be worse, but I wouldn't play dice with applications with critical security requirements.
- sandworm101 3y ago
  You can make the window bigger, at least that can be done on linux. Ive never tried veracrypt's gui on windows. I very likely never will.
  - mxmlnkn 3y ago
    You can even click on the window, hold the mouse button clicked and now all mouse movements, even outside the window, register and increase the randomness meter.
speedgoose 3y ago
I think putting some efforts in the user experience is important. A better GUI may mean that more people will use encryption. Bitlocker and FireVault are very easy to use compared to VeraCrypt or LUKS, and they are much more common. So many Linux installations don't have disk encryption…
- Grimburger 3y ago
  Most definitely, especially in FOSS which has a dearth of good UX. But the point was more that this shouldn't be a form-over-function moment, do that with something else like a lounge purchase.

krylon 3y ago

That is nice. The big plus for VeraCrypt (and TrueCrypt before that), however, is that it works on Windows, macOS, and Linux. If you need an encrypted flash drive for sharing data between different systems, it's the only option that I know of. Which is unfortunate.