2 ms·

Academic application processes are often informal, because nobody wants to deal with university bureaucracy unless they absolutely have to. Even when there is a

Academic application processes are often informal, because nobody wants to deal with university bureaucracy unless they absolutely have to. Even when there is a formal process, the standard practice is usually contacting the people first, to see if there is any point in subjecting yourself to the process. Application fees can be substantial barriers to some people. The academia is international, and international payments are often difficult outside the trivial cases. For example, there are plenty of Iranian grad students around the world, but sanctions make many things difficult for them.

empyrrhicist 3y ago
Even if informal, it should be standardized. For one thing, unless the field is really unpopular, I don't know how you'd sensibly review candidates cold applying at random times. A standard application window, placing submitted materials in a cloud provider's infra (e.g., Google Drive), viewing materials with sandboxed web browsers rather than acrobat - these should be standard and well known methods. The poor hygiene of just getting sent documents by strangers and opening them needs to stop. Is it convenient? No. Tough luck, it's 2023 and this is a well known vector for infection.
- jltsiren 3y ago
  Nothing is standardized in the academia. There are too many traditions around the world, and people are not willing to abandon them just to satisfy some foreign bureaucrat's aesthetic sensibilities. In some places, if you want to do a PhD, you apply to a school. If admitted, you take classes, do rotations in different labs, and pick a supervisor. In other places, you first have to find someone willing to supervise you, and maybe also secure funding. Once you have a supervisor and funding, the application process is just a formality that can be done at any time. Reviewing candidates is the same in the academia and elsewhere. Maybe someone in your professional network already knows the candidate (the world is pretty small, after all), or maybe they already have experience and achievements to show. If there is nothing that makes them stand out, they probably wouldn't make it through the process anyway. Also, it's easier to fix the technical issues with PDF than to get the academia to standardize on anything. Maybe create a safe subset without all the unnecessary features you would not expect in a printed document, and call it PDF. And then rename the full PDF to something appropriate, like "This will devour your soul and steal your children".

empyrrhicist 3y ago

Even if informal, it should be standardized. For one thing, unless the field is really unpopular, I don't know how you'd sensibly review candidates cold applying at random times. A standard application window, placing submitted materials in a cloud provider's infra (e.g., Google Drive), viewing materials with sandboxed web browsers rather than acrobat - these should be standard and well known methods. The poor hygiene of just getting sent documents by strangers and opening them needs to stop. Is it convenient? No. Tough luck, it's 2023 and this is a well known vector for infection.

jltsiren 3y ago
Nothing is standardized in the academia. There are too many traditions around the world, and people are not willing to abandon them just to satisfy some foreign bureaucrat's aesthetic sensibilities. In some places, if you want to do a PhD, you apply to a school. If admitted, you take classes, do rotations in different labs, and pick a supervisor. In other places, you first have to find someone willing to supervise you, and maybe also secure funding. Once you have a supervisor and funding, the application process is just a formality that can be done at any time. Reviewing candidates is the same in the academia and elsewhere. Maybe someone in your professional network already knows the candidate (the world is pretty small, after all), or maybe they already have experience and achievements to show. If there is nothing that makes them stand out, they probably wouldn't make it through the process anyway. Also, it's easier to fix the technical issues with PDF than to get the academia to standardize on anything. Maybe create a safe subset without all the unnecessary features you would not expect in a printed document, and call it PDF. And then rename the full PDF to something appropriate, like "This will devour your soul and steal your children".