3 ms·
Here is a link to the actual paper instead of someone's highly editorialized blog post. http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.100107
by whyenot 15y ago
Here is a link to the actual paper instead of someone's highly editorialized blog post.
http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001071 http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal....
- moldbug 15y agoYou're really doing Professor Hawks a disservice by imagining him as some kind of foul right-wing agitator. He's actually bending over backward to be fair. Here's how a slightly more partisan biologist (Peter Frost) responds to the same material: http://evoandproud.blogspot.com/2011/07/arroseur-arrose.html http://evoandproud.blogspot.com/2011/07/arroseur-arrose.html Here's the NY Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/14/science/14skull.html http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/14/science/14skull.html
- ktizo 15y agoOther than stating that the blog post was highly editorialised, there was absolutely no indication given by whyenot about what Hawks biases might be. To be honest, your comment reads strongly as though you are projecting.