10 ms·
Yes, it's full of "glowies." (We can thank Terry Davis of Temple OS fame for that term.) Occasionally, a nutcase who intends to do harm will have been found to
by theodric 3y ago
Yes, it's full of "glowies." (We can thank Terry Davis of Temple OS fame for that term.) Occasionally, a nutcase who intends to do harm will have been found to hang out there[1], and the glowies don't want to be the last to find out if said nutcase posts their intentions in advance. Which is fair enough. That's their job, after all.
[1] like the recent Rotterdam shooter
https://nltimes.nl/2023/09/29/rotterdam-shootings-suspect-expressed-right-wing-extremist-views-online https://nltimes.nl/2023/09/29/rotterdam-shootings-suspect-ex...
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/436995585 https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/436995585
- greyface- 3y ago4chan loves the term "glowie" in part because its full expansion incorporates a racist slur, but its shortened form can be used in contexts like this, in which it seems merely irreverent rather than racist. Thanks, Terry. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/glowie https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/glowie
- theodric 3y agoAlso because typing "glow-in-the-dark CIA [neighbors]" all the time takes too long. I mean, /pol/ doesn't really shy away from using the odd slur. Just occasionally. Only in between the casual misogyny, gigachad fetishism, and soyface posting.