3 ms·
> you are lying to yourself until [...] Not really. I'm not proposing a hypothesis that needs testing; I'm just reporting subjective anecdata. I don't need to
by denton-scratch 3y ago
> you are lying to yourself until [...]
Not really. I'm not proposing a hypothesis that needs testing; I'm just reporting subjective anecdata. I don't need to test it, because even if I'm deluded it costs me 300GB instead of 100GB. Pfft.
"Lying to yourself" is silly talk; that implies that I'm knowingly telling myself a falsehood, which doesn't make sense. At worst, I'm mistaken.
- willis936 3y ago>that implies that I'm knowingly telling myself a falsehood You are aware of a common fact backed up by mountains of empirical data, a strong physical explanation, and fundamentals of information theory, but tell yourself this lie: >I'm convinced that we can "hear" frequencies well above the reputed 20KHz limit of human hearing This is a lie. You tell it to yourself. You must see this.