3 ms·
I however think you can't cite any statement in that post directly containing that assumption, if it was "clear" to you it says more about your assumptions than
by acqq 3y ago
I however think you can't cite any statement in that post directly containing that assumption, if it was "clear" to you it says more about your assumptions than about the actual content discussed.
- cycrutchfield 3y agoThe person who wrote the original post replied above saying that my interpretation of his post was correct. What other “proofs” do you need?
- acqq 3y agoI'm simply not interested in person's later claims, the post does not contain any conditionals. That is exactly what I argue, let me repeat if it wasn't clear enough: if somebody "sees" them where they aren't it's due to their assumptions existing independently of what is actually written in the post.
- cycrutchfield 3y ago[flagged]