4 ms·

To be honest I don't understand what your goal is. Use one toolchain to produce the binaries you distribute, sure. Only provide support for those official binar

by mort96 3y ago

To be honest I don't understand what your goal is. Use one toolchain to produce the binaries you distribute, sure. Only provide support for those official binaries or binaries compiled with the officially supported toolchain, why not. And use -Werror with that standardized toolchain in CI to ensure builds with warnings don't get committed, I think that's great. But why are you hell bent on making it harder for your users to build from source?

charcircuit 3y ago
>But why are you hell bent on making it harder for your users to build from source? Building from source would use the toolchain you designed the source code for meaning that it will always succeed. If someone wants to fork the project and add support for a different toolchain they are free to do so. If they want to get rid of the requirement to have no compiler errors they are free to remove -Werror or disable the new warnings.
- mort96 3y ago
  Honestly the only code base I've seen which does this is Google's Chromium stuff; by default, it will download a pre-built Clang as well as a Debian sysroot. IMO, it's completely insane and has always been a giant pain in the ass. Maybe it's warranted for something as complex as Chromium but I really don't think it's the right choice for some 10kLOC FOSS project.