3 ms·

This is very serious. The fact is that they promoted that they not allowing revealed faces in their paper. That's mean that every person that in the training da

This is very serious. The fact is that they promoted that they not allowing revealed faces in their paper. That's mean that every person that in the training data could be revealed, and there is not transparency about their training data who is in or not (same as all the artists that are forced to opt-in to their data/ scraped by the GPT-BOT....)

bastawhiz 3y ago
> That's mean that every person that in the training data could be revealed The examples you linked do not show that this statement is true. Far from it. You showed that one of the most high profile people in the world can be recognized. There are millions (ten of millions? hundreds?) of photos of Elon Musk out there. He was TIME's person of the year. You'd need to show that photos of non-uber-famous individuals who are seen in a small handful of public photos are identifiable for me to believe that statement.