2 ms·
>LLMs are have guardrails engineered into them They don't. What do people think LLMs are lol ? The only way to control the output of a LLM is to essentially r
by famouswaffles 3y ago
>LLMs are have guardrails engineered into them
They don't. What do people think LLMs are lol ?
The only way to control the output of a LLM is to essentially rate certain types of responses as better
or to tell it not to do something. any other "guardrails" are outside direct influence of the LLM (i.e a separate classifier that blocks certain words).
Nobody is "engineering" anything into LLMs.
- TerrifiedMouse 3y ago> The only way to control the output of a LLM is to essentially rate certain types of responses as better Which is my point. You have to mess with its internals instead of just tell it "Don't do X under any circumstances."
- famouswaffles 3y agoFirst of all, no you don't have to. Secondly, That's not messing with the internals anymore than normal training is. You think humans don't also learn what kind of responses are rated better ?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- squeaky-clean 3y agoColloquially, LLM tends to refer to the entire product. Not just the model weights. For example technically GPT-4 isn't an LLM, it's 16 LLMs in a trench coat.