3 ms·
You're basically arguing that the peons should have to reduce their carbon footprint but not the hyper wealthy. It's a bit inane considering crimping less than
by Gibbon1 3y ago
You're basically arguing that the peons should have to reduce their carbon footprint but not the hyper wealthy.
It's a bit inane considering crimping less than a 1000 peoples lifestyle would save us 1.2% right off the bat.
And seriously other than they are super duper rich why should we care about them at all?
- monkeywork 3y agomight want to go check your math there, you moved that decimal quite significantly