4 ms·

There were many more already week ago... (location & identity restored from trained data..) Causing even more (privacy) concerns.. https://twitter.com/MetaAsA

There were many more already week ago... (location & identity restored from trained data..) Causing even more (privacy) concerns.. https://twitter.com/MetaAsAService/status/1706798834603434149?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1706798834603434149%7Ctwgr%5E7a45fece9c8e0164e4d8214539e150e5b3b4be66%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fthreadreaderapp.com%2Fthread%2F1706941117911220265 https://twitter.com/MetaAsAService/status/170679883460343414...

shrx 3y ago
The link is useless without an account
- jeroenhd 3y ago
  Try using Nitter as an alternative frontend: https://nitter.net/MetaAsAService/status/1706798834603434149 https://nitter.net/MetaAsAService/status/1706798834603434149
bastawhiz 3y ago
If that information is easily searched, what's the risk here? I'm not sure I see the harm in a computer being able to identify the high profile owner of a social network or the well-known subject of a popular Internet meme. Guessing locations based on images is literally the premise of the popular game "Geo Guesser".
- extraduder_ire 3y ago
  Has anyone made an image bot trained with street-view data? I'm sure it would rely too much on meta-info to be useful outside of geo guesser, but would be swell to see. To that end, has anyone attempted to scrape much of that data google et-al collected?
- transformi 3y ago
  This is very serious. The fact is that they promoted that they not allowing revealed faces in their paper. That's mean that every person that in the training data could be revealed, and there is not transparency about their training data who is in or not (same as all the artists that are forced to opt-in to their data/ scraped by the GPT-BOT....)
  - bastawhiz 3y ago
    > That's mean that every person that in the training data could be revealed The examples you linked do not show that this statement is true. Far from it. You showed that one of the most high profile people in the world can be recognized. There are millions (ten of millions? hundreds?) of photos of Elon Musk out there. He was TIME's person of the year. You'd need to show that photos of non-uber-famous individuals who are seen in a small handful of public photos are identifiable for me to believe that statement.

shrx 3y ago

The link is useless without an account

jeroenhd 3y ago
Try using Nitter as an alternative frontend: https://nitter.net/MetaAsAService/status/1706798834603434149 https://nitter.net/MetaAsAService/status/1706798834603434149

bastawhiz 3y ago

If that information is easily searched, what's the risk here? I'm not sure I see the harm in a computer being able to identify the high profile owner of a social network or the well-known subject of a popular Internet meme. Guessing locations based on images is literally the premise of the popular game "Geo Guesser".

extraduder_ire 3y ago
Has anyone made an image bot trained with street-view data? I'm sure it would rely too much on meta-info to be useful outside of geo guesser, but would be swell to see. To that end, has anyone attempted to scrape much of that data google et-al collected?
transformi 3y ago
This is very serious. The fact is that they promoted that they not allowing revealed faces in their paper. That's mean that every person that in the training data could be revealed, and there is not transparency about their training data who is in or not (same as all the artists that are forced to opt-in to their data/ scraped by the GPT-BOT....)
- bastawhiz 3y ago
  > That's mean that every person that in the training data could be revealed The examples you linked do not show that this statement is true. Far from it. You showed that one of the most high profile people in the world can be recognized. There are millions (ten of millions? hundreds?) of photos of Elon Musk out there. He was TIME's person of the year. You'd need to show that photos of non-uber-famous individuals who are seen in a small handful of public photos are identifiable for me to believe that statement.