4 ms·
No thank you. There's no need for that. Instead of this petty, divisive and hostile nonsense, how about we just acknowledge that our civilization is fundamenta
by mrshadowgoose 3y ago
No thank you. There's no need for that.
Instead of this petty, divisive and hostile nonsense, how about we just acknowledge that our civilization is fundamentally based on energy use, and work towards making all our energy use carbon-neutral?
Our planet receives enough harnessable solar energy to allow every single human being an energy allocation far in excess of a typical American.
There's absolutely no need to be hostile towards other people's energy use. Advocate for fundamental change, not petty ineffectual bullshit.
- mcbrienollie 3y agoI totally agree with the fundamental changes. Rest is bullshit. What would be your suggestion on Kardaishan's energy consumption levels? Having a crash course?
- mrshadowgoose 3y ago> What would be your suggestion on Kardaishan's energy consumption levels? Having a crash course? Couldn't care less. Seriously, go do the math on how much energy is available to us. It will blow your ignorant little mind.
- lxgr 3y agoNobody is claiming that humanity is at a risk of running out of energy. The stone age didn't end because we ran out of stones either.
- lxgr 3y ago> Our planet receives enough harnessable solar energy to allow every single human being an energy allocation far in excess of a typical American. Yes, but is it currently being harvested? Do we have a plausible path towards that future? > There's absolutely no need to be hostile towards other people's energy use. No, but there's a dire need to properly account for the externalities of everybody's CO2 emissions if we want to be able to plausibly call our economy market-based.