3 ms·

GLP is a Monsanto-fronted publication [0], so there is a significant bias and I'd take anything they say (i.e. a company that really would like you to buy crop

• AlbertCory 3y ago
  Paraphrasing: "ok, but I am going to evaluate the person presenting it."
  • petee 3y ago
    Since its so easy to misrepresent data, it'd be irresponsible not to consider the presenter at all, especially one with a reputation such as Monsanto. All those ads/studies saying cigarettes were safe, also had evidence Edit: wont let me reply to you, but evidence can be cherry picked by the presenter to make it lean their way. Again, its irresponsible to not consider who is providing you that evidence. That said, I haven't seen you cite anything
    • AlbertCory 3y ago
      You still haven't said anything about the actual evidence. The reason there was no reply button is just that not enough time had elapsed. Clever of you to try to turn it around, but sorry, no dice: the article you're dismissing IS the evidence. What do you have?
      • smegsicle 3y ago
        you bring a compelling argument, however, has "monsanto is pushing it, so it's probably warped" ever led us wrong?
        • AlbertCory 3y ago
          I expect they've sponsored a lot of research. So you've read it all?