2 ms·
It's probably suffice to say 39°C. It's unlikely the temperature was exactly 102°F; these measures are almost always rounded to the whole unit.
by chungy 3y ago
It's probably suffice to say 39°C. It's unlikely the temperature was exactly 102°F; these measures are almost always rounded to the whole unit.
- cesarb 3y agoAccording to a recent article in Portuguese (https://g1.globo.com/am/amazonas/noticia/2023/10/01/icmbio-vai-investigar-mortes-de-mais-de-100-botos-no-am-animais-encalhados-sao-resgatados.ghtml https://g1.globo.com/am/amazonas/noticia/2023/10/01/icmbio-v...) "[...] em alguns pontos do lago a temperatura está ultrapassando a marca dos 39°" so the correct value is "above 39°C".
- chungy 3y agoAye. Anything above 39.16 °C would get translated whole-units to 103° F. Some smartphone, I think it was Apple, had an issue like this where they got weather information in whole units of celsius and translated to Fahrenheit for display at the user's option. Since Celsius is not as fine-grained of a unit, it caused skips of the nature like 68°F to 70°F. Using finer-grained measurements, it would be possible to convert to every whole-unit °F, but it wasn't being done.