11 ms·
This is the flaw in having an entirely hateful view of splitting, that view is itself an example of splitting. You have to instead believe that there is a time
by philosopher1234 3y ago
This is the flaw in having an entirely hateful view of splitting, that view is itself an example of splitting. You have to instead believe that there is a time where it is appropriate and useful to split (e.g, war) and times where it isn’t (general thinking)
- xyzelement 3y agoThere's so just room for some sort of splitting to represent truth. The article talks about packers and mappers and that either is it isn't a useful distinction. I am open to either, but I wouldn't dismiss the idea because it's "splitting" by nature.
- boo-ga-ga 3y agoI get that splitting can be useful and logical in many particular situations. But when we talk about very general case like being a good engineer, it is definitely not a good way to reason.
- travoltaj 3y agoSo you're saying that the splitters are split into two groups? One group which knows when it's a good time to split, and the other group which doesn't?,
- Gimpei 3y agoThis feels like a false equivalence. Splitting articles try to make broad generalizations about human behavior, but, as any social scientist knows, human behavior is extremely complicated and multidimensional. A critique of these articles is about falsity, which is binary.