2 ms·
This response is comic. Are you sure I am the one stifling dialogue? I did not assert any false equivalence, that's your mistaken interpretation. Given your po
by brabel 3y ago
This response is comic. Are you sure I am the one stifling dialogue?
I did not assert any false equivalence, that's your mistaken interpretation. Given your poor reading skills, I agree there's no reason to continue a dialogue, actually.
- catiopatio 3y agoYour first false equivalence arises out of trivializing the qualitative differences in freedom between China and the USA/EU, implicitly framing the limitations in China as comparable to those in democratic societies. This is misleading given the severe restrictions on human rights, freedom of speech, and rule of law in an authoritarian regime like China. Your second false equivalence is in your equating of limited, private content moderation by a social network with systemic human rights abuses by government.